As Brian mentioned in [1],[2] as in the CWG wanted to get a constructive feedback on COC and COCE proposed drafts from the whole community on the FAB list highlights one issue that the project is facing as in we don't have a good way of gathering community feedback on topics. This issue is probably know but for some reason not being worked upon? ( Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong ) Anyway to point out the obvious encase nobody was aware of this issue. ( we have been without one for now about 15 release cycles so something is amiss ) He posts the proposed drafts to a single mailing list which.. a) Has a limited number of users subscribed to it b) Requires all members of the community to be subscribed to that particular list. c) Mailing list provide the ability to see and reply to others people feed back resulting in so called *noise* as in people reassuring their feedback encase the message/meaning did get through and etc.. rather then constructive discussion. That results in an end result that is far from being effective and reaching the whole community. Coming up with a rough solution to gather the feedback is a no brainer First we need a common dominator that applies to all community members and that one is obvious FAS account. Next we need a web server with a DB backend, hooked up to FAS with an simple web page that the community member logs into that displays to him what he needs to provide his feedback and two text boxes one for the feedback and another one for any question he might have with regards to the proposal/draft itself. With the above in place all that is needed is to request the feedback via our public channels like a mail to the announce or something similar. Now the tricky part is coming up with a simple yet scalable to the total number of community members solution, to work through all that feedback I got couple of ideas up my sleeves for that but instead of reinventing the wheel I propose that existing survey tools like [1],[2] be looked at first to see how they have solved the problem we are facing. JBG 1. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2011-March/010525.html 2. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2011-March/010526.html 3. http://www.limesurvey.org/ 4. http://www.doodle.com _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
