On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 21:11, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 17:13 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Ok this may seem silly, but after wading through a bunch of kickstarts >> today trying to find out which ones are for what.. could we >> standardize on a convention? We have a couple :). >> >> I like this one: >> >> <host type>-<os>-<os-release>-<special> >> >> Examples. >> kvm-rhel-5-nfs >> xen-rhel-6-nohd >> hardware-rhel-5-xenserver >> hardware-rhel-5-nohd >> >> Once we have a convention, I can go and rename stuff to meet it (maybe >> put the kickstarts under a git tree also?) > > under a git, tree, sure - but do not, do not, do not, split the git tree > into staging/production branches. There's no point in that for the > kickstarts. > > > also - unless there is a compelling reason to - why don't we assume that > all new builds are rhel6 - and therefore kvm? The compelling reason I see is that it will be about 6-12 months before we have converted all our el5's to el6's so its probably a good idea to keep the other naming scheme around til then. [And just in case EL7 decides to go use oracle btrfs containers.. might as well just put the name in the front so we don't get confused in 2-3 years time :). -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
