On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So how much of infrastructure is still using TG-1.0.x and how much >> work will it be to move to TG2 since that may sooner or later be our >> only alternative. >> > bodhi, mirrormanager, packagedb, elections, fas, smolt -- everything that's > written in TG except fedoracommunity is TG1. > I wonder if TG2 is the best target - will that just be punting the problem down a few years? Maybe pyramid + sqlalchemy + [genshi | mako] is a better target. I'm not sure if that's what TurboGears2 actually is, or will be. But it seems like there's a bit of upheaval going on with pylons and pyramid. Maybe that should shake out a little? Either way, I've written a bit of TurboGears and CherryPy apps, and I'd like to help with the transition. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
