On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 18:50, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:52:13PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: >> On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 17:17 -0700, Jonathan Steffan wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:01 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > > EPEL6 is going out of beta soon so on Monday I'll need to decide >> > > whether to revert TG in EPEL6 to TG-1.0.x or work on fixing fas >> > > further. >> > >> > Please don't restrict version upgrades in public repos because of FAS. >> > That is not fair to our downstream. Worse case we can maintain an >> > internal 1.0.x TG until we have all the bugs worked out for 1.1.x. >> > >> >> It's not just about fas - the issue seems to be that the TG update is >> NOT backward compatible which was the presumption on the pushed update >> AIUI. >> > Yep. Most people are moving onto TurboGears-2. So the only reason I want to > have TurboGear-1.x is for compat with apps not yet ported. Currently both > TG-1.0 and TG-1.1 are supported branches by upstream. Soon upstream is > going to release TG-1.5.x as well. TG-1.5.x is definitely not compatible > (it's built on top of cherrypy3 instead of cherrypy2) but upstream told me > (and in their release announcements, etc) that TG-1.1 was going to be > compatible with TG-1.0.x. Sadly, this isn't the case. > So how much of infrastructure is still using TG-1.0.x and how much work will it be to move to TG2 since that may sooner or later be our only alternative. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
