2010/12/9 Domingo Becker <domingobecker@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/12/9 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:42:02 -0300 >> Domingo Becker <domingobecker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Yes, you're right, it's sysadmin-web. >>> I'm new in fedora-admin and I'm working on ticket 2389, about >>> Transifex update. >>> >>> I have no problem to take care of Transifex once I get it updated. >> >> Cool. There are several other tickets related to it... >> >>> I'm currently stuck with the transifex package requirement of intltool >>> 0.37.1 or above. >>> CentOS 5.5 base repo has intltool 0.35.0 so I guess it would be faster >>> for Fedora to push an update to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing repo. >> >> Not possible I'm afraid. >> >> EPEL never ships anything thats part of the base OS. >> > > Oops > >>> I asked Matthias Lasen (mclasen), the intltool package maintainer, >>> about the possibility to push an update to Fedora EPEL 5. I'm still >>> waiting for an answer. >> >> He's likely not going to be able to help. >> You would need to get the RHEL maintainer (whoever that is) to push >> such an update. I suspect they would have very strong resistance to >> doing so in a stable release. ;( >> > > I tested in CentOS 5.5 with a package for F10. > But I did that by hand. > Doing that would be like cheating! > And it may be not acceptable by some internal policy. > > I thought of the install to be as easy as doing a > > yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing transifex > > I have all packages in place now, except intltool. :-( > > Who maintains intltool in RHEL5? > Perhaps asking... > If the package may not reach RHEL5 updates-testing, I guess we may use the fedora-admin repo for this exception. Is it possible? _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
