2010/12/8 Matt Micene <matt.micene@xxxxxxx>: >> The only additional one I was thinking of was perhaps a 'Transifex' >> one, as there are a number of tickets for it. I don't know that we > have >> a FIG/Group to assign them to however. ;( >> >> If you could look at the FIGS and see if there is a mapping now? >> If not I can adjust or create new components? > > > I'm probably not the best source since I started this *because* I was > new and trying to feel my way around the FIGs and what work was done > where but.... I believe that Transifex is handled within the > sysadmin-web FIG. Maybe someone from sysadmin-web can confirm or deny? > Yes, you're right, it's sysadmin-web. I'm new in fedora-admin and I'm working on ticket 2389, about Transifex update. I have no problem to take care of Transifex once I get it updated. I'm currently stuck with the transifex package requirement of intltool 0.37.1 or above. CentOS 5.5 base repo has intltool 0.35.0 so I guess it would be faster for Fedora to push an update to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing repo. I asked Matthias Lasen (mclasen), the intltool package maintainer, about the possibility to push an update to Fedora EPEL 5. I'm still waiting for an answer. kind regards Domingo Becker _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
