On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:24:25 -0500 "Matt Micene" <matt.micene@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I think this is a good idea. There was some mapping of components to > FIGs, but it was somewhat informal and I a few times I had to go back > to Mike to clarify. Having a mapping that relates work (tickets) to > FIGs would probably help people figure out how to contribute. There > looks like some changes to components since last I looked too. Is > this the work you've been doing Kevin? Yes, I added some components for things that had more than a few outstanding tickets. ;) The only additional one I was thinking of was perhaps a 'Transifex' one, as there are a number of tickets for it. I don't know that we have a FIG/Group to assign them to however. ;( If you could look at the FIGS and see if there is a mapping now? If not I can adjust or create new components? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
