On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:37, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:28 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Currently we are using Bacula 2.4.4 for our backups. With the upcoming >> upgrades to RHEL-6 the main backup software will be bacula-5.0.0. I >> have 'gleaned' that the upgrade from 2.x to 5.x is not simple which >> means we are going to need to do a project on how this will be done. >> >> I am looking for people who have done project management in the past >> to help out on this.. mainly it would be to help step through people >> who may not have large scale project experience on what things usually >> need to be done: scoping, staffing, dropback points, documentation, >> etc. >> > > > Are there forward/backward compat issues with clients? > > ie if we're still on bacula 2.X on the master can be backup a bacula 5.X > client? As far I can tell nothing between 2.x is compatible with 5.x .. just too much has gone on between the two releases. So part of the project is going to be: 1) How much history do we need? How do we keep it? 2) Do we need new hardware? How much will that be? etc. > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure > -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
