On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:37:29 -0700 John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems to me that this is a very important group. Do we have an > SOP that describes how this group is handled? Not that I know of... perhaps there should be one. > Things like: > > a) What kind of "controls" do we have to make sure that the @signers > group is limited and that it requires some sort of approval to add > people to it? No more so than any other fas group I don't think. > b) Who has the ability to add another person? The admin/sponsors of the group. Currently jkeating is the only admin, there are no sponsors. > c) Are people promptly removed when they no longer need to do any > signing? I don't know. I would hope so. > d) Who has the ability to remove people? admin/sponsor of the group? I think if we are going to write up policies for this group, we might also put on the same page other "important" groups. ie, sysadmin-main, cvsadmin, possibly others? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
