Re: Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/03/2010 07:49 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'd like to use this build:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
> >
> > on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
> >
> > Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> > It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> > tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
> >
> >
>
> While I'm not opposed to this upgrade, I wonder if I missed something.
> When I became aware of this bug, it only seemed to effect client side
> installs, that is users who had the bad build could not clone from
> pkgs01.  But users who had a good build could, without any change to the
> infrastructure on pkgs01.  Is there a use case failure I'm missing?
>

I think you're right actually, tmz and I discussed on #fedora-admin and
realized after we upgraded it that it didn't much make a difference on the
server.

	-Mike
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux