On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/03/2010 07:49 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > I'd like to use this build: > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842 > > > > on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem: > > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805 > > > > Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01). > > It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with > > tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade. > > > > > > While I'm not opposed to this upgrade, I wonder if I missed something. > When I became aware of this bug, it only seemed to effect client side > installs, that is users who had the bad build could not clone from > pkgs01. But users who had a good build could, without any change to the > infrastructure on pkgs01. Is there a use case failure I'm missing? > I think you're right actually, tmz and I discussed on #fedora-admin and realized after we upgraded it that it didn't much make a difference on the server. -Mike _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
