Re: any objections on installing htop?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Ricky Elrod wrote:
>
> > Yep, which is why I'm asking here. It's not a daemon or long-running service
> > or anything, but I do understand what you're saying. And yes, I'm planning on
> > getting some -main's to +1 it, but I was told the first step was throwing an email
> > out on the list.
> >
>
> If it doesn't pull any crazy deps in I'm not necessarly against it but
> it's not clear to me what it buys us over the tools that are on there now.
> You mentioned load (you can get with 'w').  CPU and RAM can both be
> ordered by the top command already installed.
>

That seems like it would be useful to some, I'm not sure I would
personally use it (I'm more of a sar man myself), but it's a non-suid tiny
app that others might be able to use, fine by me.

	-Mike
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux