On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:34:20AM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > If you're going to try to get other, non-Fedora, projects using this, having > a new mailing list might be a better fit. People from other projects might > not be especially keen to get the fedora-infra list discussion just to work > on datanommer. This is exactly what I'm trying to do, so... On the other hand, the suggested list is for all statistics discussions *within* Fedora. Maybe it would be a better idea to have a datanommer list at Fedora Hosted, and leave Fedora-specific discussion to this list. > The worry I have when a project that Fedora is relying on heavily gets its > own mailing list is that the communication between the project and Fedora > Admins tends to degrade. Schedules for deployment, resources to host the > service, people to maintain applications, etc all seem to get talked about > on the other list and the infrastructure group gets pulled in at the last > minute when we have to resolve conflicts, try to fix code unfamiliar to us, > or simply say no. It's easy for me to say "oh no, no, this won't happen," but it's a lot harder to keep that promise. ;) I can try my best to keep all of the discussions that need to happen here, here. Getting an RFR and a sponsor (which is something else I need to do) should probably help with that. -- Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Attachment:
pgpm0rhb1VM1n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
