On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:44:00PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:54:13PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > > > Also, TG2.1, which is in EL-5 testing, is already on our app servers as > > of yesterday. If we need to pull 2.1 out of EL-5, we'll want to > > downgrade. > > > Yeah -- EPEL is somewhat of a separate issue but we (EPEL) may not want to > have EPEL-5 at a higher evr than RHEL-6 when we can help it. I don't know > that there's actually a policy on this, though. I'll ask around on #epel. > Sounds like people usually need to reinstall between RHEL major releases, upgrades are not possible. So we can have versions go backwards if we want to. From that standpoint, EL-5 can go to a higher version than what's in base RHEL-6. Whether the internal API was widely enough used by third parties to warrant not pushing to EPEL I don't know. Sounds like the template API changes, at least, would be esoteric enough to not affect too many people. (Unless, people writing their own connectors between templating languages and TG2 depend on those internal APIs.) -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp6HrOf1r8iH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
