On Thursday 22 April 2010 06:48:44 am Jon Stanley wrote: > Because of the ongoing pain with fedorahosted, now that the RHEL6 beta > is available, I'm going to work really hard this weekend on getting > RHEL6 whipped into shape with: > > 1) A kickstart > 2) Packages that we need in hosted that are not in RHEL proper (trac > comes to mind immediately, I'm sure there's a few more) Lets hold off on this until we can start building epel for EL-6 which is likely a couple of weeks away. > > This gives us the benefit of being able to run a more modern trac (and > close the attendant tickets for plugins that won't work in 0.10), and > generally alleviates a good deal of pain that we've been seeing. It > also gets us a bzr upgrade, which aiui is an incompatible on-disk > format??? Toshio can you elaborate? The SCM versions that we pick up > in RHEL6 are (all of these are in RHEL proper now): > > cvs-1.11.23-9.el6.x86_64 > bzr-2.0.2-1.1.el6.x86_64 > git-1.6.5.2-1.2.el6.x86_64 > mercurial-1.4-1.el6.2.x86_64 > subversion-1.6.6-1.1.el6.x86_64 we dont support cvs on hosted otherwise its good that all the scms are in rhel. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
