> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:49:53 -0600 (CST) > From: Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Monitoring > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > So I'm just going to throw this out there. Anyone else think zabbix isn't > > > quite working out? > > > > FWIW I stopped using Zabbix at $DAYJOB a while ago. I've been giving > > OpenNMS a try out and mostly I'm happy so far. The primary blocker > > for use in Fedora Infrastructure is getting it packaged properly. > > > > Now this is an interesting tidbit. Can you give a brief review of the two > and why you're on OpenNMS now? We've actually been looking at OpenNMS for noc use. I have not developed an opinion about it yet. -- Matthew Galgoci Network Operations Red Hat, Inc 919.754.3700 x43155 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
