On 02/20/2010 06:24 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:19:57AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >>> I would rather have the SIG be in a position to make the assumption >>> that >>> the Desktop and KDE spins are safe and well-cared of rather then the >>> Fedora Project itself doing so, and I would want to eliminate the >>> "exception to the normal process" for these spins so that we have one >>> less exception to the rules. >> >> I still don't see the Desktop an KDE live images as "spins". The KDE >> one is borderline. > > While I do see the KDE Live image as a spin, the fact remains that I > can name a sizable handful of people who are constantly involved in > ensuring its proper working order. Messrs. Kofler, Dieter, Ngo, > Parrish, Řezník, and Boeckel come to mind off hand. I'm sure there > are quite a few others. > I fail to see how the number of people involved (that we know of, that we can point out) is part of the definition of a "spin". -- Jeroen _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
