Re: Spins late TM approval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> I would rather have the SIG be in a position to make the assumption
> that
> the Desktop and KDE spins are safe and well-cared of rather then the
> Fedora Project itself doing so, and I would want to eliminate the
> "exception to the normal process" for these spins so that we have one
> less exception to the rules. 

I still don't see the Desktop an KDE live images as "spins".  The KDE
one is borderline.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux