On 02/18/2010 11:32 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > On 02/17/2010 10:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:48 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>> Re: >>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2010-February/007978.html >>> >>> Through an oversight, the Board hadn't addressed TM approval for the >>> new Security Spin. If the Board were to approve it tomorrow (slightly >>> late according to the published schedule), would that cause any >>> problems for the Infrastructure, Release Engineering, or QA teams? >> >> >> None that I'm aware of from releng side, but I honestly don't know what >> the list of spins for F13 is going to be. >> > > The list of spins at this moment in time is at: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Spins_Fedora_13 > > 9 of these are to be included in the Release, excluding Desktop and KDE > which for some reason are outside of the Spins SIG's processes completely. > > We agreed on making available the an RPM package through rawhide, which > is built and should land in rawhide (and F-13 after a tag request I > believe?) > And so it turns out F-13 is already in Bodhi, which I've used to put in an update request. The package name is fedora-kickstarts, which contains (should contain) all the kickstarts for media part of the release, including it's dependencies (the base kickstarts). -- Jeroen _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
