On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:10 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:48 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Re: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2010-February/007978.html > > > > Through an oversight, the Board hadn't addressed TM approval for the > > new Security Spin. If the Board were to approve it tomorrow (slightly > > late according to the published schedule), would that cause any > > problems for the Infrastructure, Release Engineering, or QA teams? > > > None that I'm aware of from releng side, but I honestly don't know what > the list of spins for F13 is going to be. I'm not aware of any planned testing for the Security spin, so there wouldn't be issue with this late arrival for QA. Of course, if there is interest in fleshing out testing the Spin, or including it in release validation efforts ... we can work with the Security folks on that. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
