Re: [SPAM] RFC: SpamAssassin subject munging considered harmful :)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-02-02 03:02:18 PM, Tristan Santore wrote:
> I like the spam headers, and have yet to see a single message marked as spam,
> which originated from a user. And I am on multiple lists.
> Also, without the headers of the message, it is hard to say what is causing
> said scoring. It could be the users end or maybe even their fault, i.e. using a
> SMTP they should not. As it happened to one of my clients. Also, just because
> it is marked [spam], does not mean it gets removed, and I believe most people
> can use common sense in that regard.
Todd attached the message and full headers, and in this case, it seems 
that the presence of a domain name with ".com" in the middle caused a 
huge spam score, which definitely seems unreasonable.

I agree with Todd that the spam headers suffice without having to munge 
the subject.

Thanks,
Ricky

Attachment: pgpDiG1VvkA4C.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux