On that note: At my work someone brought up Zarafa (zarafa.com) as a possible replacement for zimbra (which we already use), and, although I haven't used it yet, looks like a nice and complete suite. I am not a legal expert either, so you may want to check on that as well. My 2c. On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 00:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 19:36 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Zarafa is up at Publictest16. > > Anyone want to test? > > > > Please refer to last three comments of > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197 > > As I posted to the ticket, I've come across another candidate which > appears to meet the requirements and which I don't _think_ we've > dismissed already - eGroupWare: > > http://www.egroupware.org/ > > it has a decent web interface, doesn't seem to be insane in any way, > doesn't need Java (it's PHP), is fairly mature and actively developed, > and has CalDAV support for the calendaring stuff. > > I'm probably going to deploy it on my own network for my own needs, will > try to report back on how that goes. My servers run Mandriva, where it's > packaged (though a very old version, I'm currently updating the > packages).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
