Jon Stanley wrote:
> Well they haven't been interested for quite some time, I think
> they've finally come to realize that gitweb as is is crap.
>
> But John made an interesting point to me at FUDCon that might be
> disincentive for upstream to accept this: "there are probably 20
> people in the world that need this code, and I know 15 of them" :)
My take from reading the review of the patches on the git list is that
they would be accepted, but they need to be done in a way that doesn't
negatively impact those who don't want/need the caching.
The git folks are often pretty hard on patch reviews, but I think that
results in better, more maintainable code in git.git. :)
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Men have become the tools of their tools.
-- Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)
Attachment:
pgpLJWtbptQ3w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
