On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nothing's ever easy, is it? > > So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end. It's > working as expected and everything is good. The problem is pdns's dnssec > implementation is... not particularly mature or really even usable AFAIK > with geodns. > > Anyone out there doing both geo location and dnssec with their name > servers? Not really. Most places I know do not do dns-sec (either waiting until .com/.org is signed or until its required) or if they are doing dns-sec aren't doing geoip. The solutions that comes to mind would be to have the geoip code in an unsigned sub-zone. Its not great but until 2011 I don't see it being much better. > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
