On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 10:44:29AM -0600, Nick Bebout wrote: > Probably was the email from me. I forgot to send from my fedora email. > > I'll discuss it with the rest of the infra team. It may be possible that > we could consider opening and closing the freemedia form as a planned > change and not have to get change requests approved. Yes, change requests > can be annoying but their purpose is not to make any changes that could > break things around the time of releases. The October opening and closing > just happened to happen at the time of the f12-beta prerelease freeze, and > now we are in the f12-final freeze. > > I have 1 +1, and should be able to get another one soon, as soon as I see > another sysadmin-main or releng person on IRC or as soon as they see the > email to fedora-infrastructure-list. I'd be fine with granting this an exception, if we limited the scope of the change allowed. In particular, rather than directly editing Freemedia-form.html and adding/removing dozends of lines each time, a 1-line change in init.pp could accomplish the same thing, publishing either the 'open' or 'closed' page as necessary. Then such a change hitting the puppet master tree would be very limited and clearly couldn't break other things. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
