Re: FTF (FedoraTalk FAD) IRC Meeting this TUESDAY @ 3 PM EDT (19:00 UTC)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:11:44PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
> 
> > Bruno Wolff III said the following on 10/06/2009 08:59 AM Pacific Time:
> > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05 -0700,
> > >   John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Yes it is today at 3 PM EDT on #fedora-fad
> > >
> > > I'll probably miss the meeting, but might make the tail end of it. I'll
> > > be recording it though to review.
> > >
> > > > 1) Nail down the package version of Asterisk that we will use at the
> > > > FAD and a canonical place to download it from
> > >
> > > And what packages should get installed. I suspect that a lot of them
> > > aren't necessary for this project.
> > >
> > > > 2) Confirm the underlying version of the OS we plan to run #1 on
> > > > 3) Suggest that everyone set up and configure a test environment
> > > > running #1 and #2
> > >
> > > Some recommendations on the configuration would be nice as well. A lot of
> > > config files are installed by default that aren't needed for a minimal
> > > system and I am not sure if they are all safe to leave as is. So it would
> > > be nice to know which ones are needed and which should get modified.
> > >
> >
> > Should we be thinking then in terms of an SOP documenting the configuration
> > and building Asterisk or is this done implicitly with puppet?
> >
> 
> Generally the SOP is for maintenance and common problems, you wouldn't put
> one together for installation.  The "installation" part of it is all done
> in puppet.
> 
> > McGrath--are there examples for other applications we could follow when doing
> > this for Asterisk?
> >
> 
> Hmm.  I'd guess any application based SOP would be a good start.  The
> transifex one is good:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Translations_Infrastructure_SOP
> 
> I'd guess just remember the SOP is targeted towards the Infrastructure
> group and possibly some involved indirectly with Infrastructure (Like the
> content hosting SOP)
> 
> I know we're going to be looking to add things like recording (which we
> have now but is too complicated to use) and the webcasting stuff.  Any end
> user docs should be added to the http://talk.fedoraproject.org/ site where
> it can be properly translated, etc.

To wit:  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1723

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux