On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:11:44PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, John Poelstra wrote: > > > Bruno Wolff III said the following on 10/06/2009 08:59 AM Pacific Time: > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05 -0700, > > > John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes it is today at 3 PM EDT on #fedora-fad > > > > > > I'll probably miss the meeting, but might make the tail end of it. I'll > > > be recording it though to review. > > > > > > > 1) Nail down the package version of Asterisk that we will use at the > > > > FAD and a canonical place to download it from > > > > > > And what packages should get installed. I suspect that a lot of them > > > aren't necessary for this project. > > > > > > > 2) Confirm the underlying version of the OS we plan to run #1 on > > > > 3) Suggest that everyone set up and configure a test environment > > > > running #1 and #2 > > > > > > Some recommendations on the configuration would be nice as well. A lot of > > > config files are installed by default that aren't needed for a minimal > > > system and I am not sure if they are all safe to leave as is. So it would > > > be nice to know which ones are needed and which should get modified. > > > > > > > Should we be thinking then in terms of an SOP documenting the configuration > > and building Asterisk or is this done implicitly with puppet? > > > > Generally the SOP is for maintenance and common problems, you wouldn't put > one together for installation. The "installation" part of it is all done > in puppet. > > > McGrath--are there examples for other applications we could follow when doing > > this for Asterisk? > > > > Hmm. I'd guess any application based SOP would be a good start. The > transifex one is good: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Translations_Infrastructure_SOP > > I'd guess just remember the SOP is targeted towards the Infrastructure > group and possibly some involved indirectly with Infrastructure (Like the > content hosting SOP) > > I know we're going to be looking to add things like recording (which we > have now but is too complicated to use) and the webcasting stuff. Any end > user docs should be added to the http://talk.fedoraproject.org/ site where > it can be properly translated, etc. To wit: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1723 -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
