On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time:
> >>>
> >>> FYI, I
> >>> plan on keeping the "official" F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on
> >>> 1.6.1.X. F13 will be the first release with 1.6.2.X.
> >>
> >> Which version do we plan to use for our development work at the FAD?
> >
> > AFAIK, we should use the version that will be rolled out on Fedora
> > Infrastructure, and that seems to be 1.6.1.x. I think Infrastructure
> > generally requires we stick with what's actively maintained and
> > considered "stable," as opposed to a preview.
>
> The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get
> conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which was
> too difficult to maintain so I took it out of the Fedora package) or
> use a kernel module that isn't upstream. Yeah, that means we're kind
> of stuck with a prerelease version but I'm not sure what else to do.
>
Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought we had that version ready for rawhide
(back when F11 was rawhide)? What happened with all that?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
