On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 09/09/2009 09:48 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > > > We could instead advertise www.ipv6.fp.o and make people choose to use > > > v6 or not. Google does this today for exactly these reasons (failures > > > elsewhere in the network we can't control). Kind of defeats the > > > purpose though. > > > > Why not do this and continue working on ipv6 on the rest of the systems? > > "rest of the systems" == rest of the world. could take a while :) > > This is precisely IPv6's catch-22: if providers don't implement IPv6, then > end user networks won't get fixed. If end user networks don't get fixed, > providers won't implement IPv6. > In fairness IPv6 is sort of a second class citizen atm. Between me, domsch and the volunteers we've had, several hours of time in the last week have been spent debugging connectivity issues wrt ipv6. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
