On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 02:17:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > At last week's meeting we made a decision about which licenses would > > best fit our needs. The results are recorded here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing > > I don't see any listing of content licenses. Other than what you put > on the wiki that is covered by that license (soon to be CC BY SA), > have you thought about specifying what you license content under? > We don't have a policy on this but should. For the CSI docs I've been using OPL1.0 or later. But I'm also curious about licenses regarding the data in our databases. I had a brief discussion with Tiemann several months ago and there are some interesting freedoms we can do here, for example licensing some of the account system information so that we Fedora don't own it, but instead each user ownes their own data and have sole responsibility over what happens with it. But that's a longer discussion for another time. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
