On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:22:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Is there any IPv6 plan for *.fedoraproject.org ? I filed a ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1623 and the related wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/IPv6 to get started on this. It would really help to get info from our kind hosting providers (PHX, tummy, telia, ibiblio, BU, serverbeach, others?) to know exactly what IPv6 capability is already present and how to get address assignments for our use there. My thought is this. MirrorManager is the most interesting service we offer that would make direct use of an IPv6 address (to do netblock lookups). As was noted in the now-closed ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1057 we will have to enable (some of?) our proxy servers to serve over IPv6, as that is where mirrors.fp.o and download.fp.o resolve. We could set up a publictest proxy instance in one of the colos with native IPv6 already, one that matches the existing proxy there, but which also serves IPv6. We create a mirrors-ipv6.fedoraproject.org AAA record which points at that proxy, and use that to test out the rest of the infrastructur (which remains serving IPv4 unchanged). This would give me a chance to work out any bugs in MM which I'm sure exist (at the very least, python-pydns doesn't do AAAA-record lookups and will need fixing). The automatic Internet2 detection will need some help too, as right now the BGP tables I'm pulling from http://syslog.abilene.ucaid.edu/bgp/WASH/RIBS/ is only listing IPv4 addresses. As for serving other content, if it's fronted by the proxy servers (e.g. web content), then it should naturally start working via the IPv6-enabled proxys. Testing will prove that out. For non-web content (git, cvs, ssh?), I believe this is mostly hosted in PHX, which at this point we don't believe has native IPv6. How can we go about requesting such in the colo? I presume this is something that Red Hat IS would have to ask for on our behalf. I'd much rather try to get native going, instead of dealing with 6to4 (the nearest 6to4 server is 10 hops and 60+ms away) or tunnels. fedorapeople is at BU, which has some native IPv6 capability, but it's not clear they use it: http://www.mrp.net/IPv6_Survey.html As for DNS servers (serving DNS over IPv6), we have: ns1 is at serverbeach. ns2 is at ibiblio. We'll need to know their native IPv6 capability before proceeding there. This is less critical, as most users are still doing their DNS lookups to an IPv4 DNS server at their ISP. But it would be nice. So, that's my thoughts. I'd love to hear yours. -Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
