On 08/19/2009 08:09 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On 08/19/2009 07:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> The host xz wouldn't be used to produce any rpms, the rpm inside the >> chroot would. Does this come into play when initing the buildroot? >> > You're right, this wouldn't come into play unless it's a decompression > bug. And if that's so it would generate an error from the buildsystem > while trying to create the buildroot instead of a corrupted payload in > the built rpms. So not as severe. I'm checking to be sure it isn't a > decompression bug now. > Confirmed -- the compressor is the issue here, not the decompressor. So we don't need to update the builders at this time. Since rawhide is the only release building with xz payloads we don't need to worry about buildroot overrides either. It *is* possible that some of the packages built before this xz package was put into the buildroot are corrupt:: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=127510 (build finished at 2009-08-17 10:32:19) I don't know if this is something releng wants to check for. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list