> On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > > Got the outline of my proposal here > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla > > > > I welcome any comments > > I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting > in bugzilla. It's not clear from the proposal if that's a proposed > feature or not. Can you clarify if it is and if so, how you'll minimize > the problem of: > 1) SPAM > 2) Bug reports with insufficient information to fix the problem with no > point of contact to get additional information. > > -Toshio I haven't had time to fully check out ABRT but are they requiring the user to have a valid bugzilla account? If I remember the original discussion around ABRT at FUDCon Boston was not to require one. SPAM can be handled through a captcha if needed. As far as not being able to contact the reporter, that is why they have the option of being cc'd to the report. They will be advised when filing the bug that without a point of contact if the developer has questions and cannot contact them that the bug could be closed as insufficient info. There are still some finer points which need to be worked out. Steven ===================================================== Steven M. Parrish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, #sugar _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
