Re: Thoughts on NOPASSWD and disabling agent forwarding on publictest machines?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2009-08-17 02:44:58 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On a related note, I would like to have a policy of rebuilding the test
> boxes more often then we do.  Just a thought.
Agreed.  publictest15 is nearing a year old, which I think is way too
long for a publictest machine.  It has all sorts of junk on it now (like
the errors that Eric got about /opt/zimbra when trying to setup zikula).  

Here s a summary of our currently running publictest machines and the
date they were built on (from an rpm -qa --last | tail -1):

publictest1:  Sun 10 May 2009 09:46:49 PM GMT
publictest2:  Fri 29 May 2009 11:06:26 PM UTC
publictest3:  Thu 11 Jun 2009 09:25:56 PM UTC
publictest6:  Tue 23 Jun 2009 08:34:50 PM UTC
publictest7:  Tue 30 Jun 2009 08:24:36 PM UTC
publictest10: Tue 02 Dec 2008 10:45:16 PM UTC
publictest14: Tue 16 Dec 2008 10:38:09 PM UTC
publictest15: Thu 28 Aug 2008 06:26:33 PM UTC
publictest16: Thu 23 Oct 2008 06:14:22 PM UTC

All the 2008 ones should probably be rebuilt when possible - any
thoughts as to what a good policy for this would be?  Maybe after ~4-6
months, we should stop putting new projects on publictest machines, and
rebuild them once all current projects are finished?

The wiki pages could also be great for tracking some of this stuff.

Thanks,
Ricky

Attachment: pgpTiP11CL9lp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux