On 2009-08-17 02:44:58 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > On a related note, I would like to have a policy of rebuilding the test > boxes more often then we do. Just a thought. Agreed. publictest15 is nearing a year old, which I think is way too long for a publictest machine. It has all sorts of junk on it now (like the errors that Eric got about /opt/zimbra when trying to setup zikula). Here s a summary of our currently running publictest machines and the date they were built on (from an rpm -qa --last | tail -1): publictest1: Sun 10 May 2009 09:46:49 PM GMT publictest2: Fri 29 May 2009 11:06:26 PM UTC publictest3: Thu 11 Jun 2009 09:25:56 PM UTC publictest6: Tue 23 Jun 2009 08:34:50 PM UTC publictest7: Tue 30 Jun 2009 08:24:36 PM UTC publictest10: Tue 02 Dec 2008 10:45:16 PM UTC publictest14: Tue 16 Dec 2008 10:38:09 PM UTC publictest15: Thu 28 Aug 2008 06:26:33 PM UTC publictest16: Thu 23 Oct 2008 06:14:22 PM UTC All the 2008 ones should probably be rebuilt when possible - any thoughts as to what a good policy for this would be? Maybe after ~4-6 months, we should stop putting new projects on publictest machines, and rebuild them once all current projects are finished? The wiki pages could also be great for tracking some of this stuff. Thanks, Ricky
Attachment:
pgpTiP11CL9lp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
