On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Today we added the transif user to the packager group because transifex > lost the ability to add translations for comps. At the moment, this > doesn't affect much -- packager group only gives you the ability to > commit to comps and what packages you are given explicit rights to. > However, it may become bigger in the future since we may allow people to > specify that anyone in packager can commit to their packages. > > transif's last commit to the comps files was around the 17th of July. > If anyone can recall some action or config change that they might have > performed that would have changed whether transif could commit to comps > between 17th of July and today or can think of a better way to give > transif access to the comps cvs repo please speak up! it would be > better long-term if transif was not in the packager group. > > The only solution we've come up with that doesn't use the packager group > so far requires that we do two things: > 1) add cvs acls for transif to commit to comps. > 2) set filesystem acls so transif can commit to comps. > > Doing #2 isn't that great an idea as it's a one-off doing something not > readily apparent (we don't use fs acls anywhere else in cvs). But if it > could be puppet managed it might not be too bad. > 2 is the more secure option. I want to find out what happened here. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
