Re: A discussion on licensing and the AGPLv3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/28/2009 12:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I take these two to answers to mean roughly:
> 
> Configuration is not copyrightable.  Therefore changes to configuration
> files and configuration within scripts is not something that needs to be
> provided under the AGPLv3.  If we are still concerned about them, Red
> Hat Legal will help us write a license for the config files that makes
> clear that changes to them do not have to be distributed.

Yes, that's precisely how I interpreted this as well.

I did miss the other questions, and have just now sent them over to RH
Legal.

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux