Re: [PATCH] Setup sigul bridge and client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 06:55 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Not necessarily related to enabling the builder repo: Is having the same
> rpm versions as the builders necessary?

Yes.  The bridge and server will be dealing with rpms that are being
built by koji, and will need to be able to understand the payloads and
checksums, as well as perform the larger signing.  As we make changes to
rpm and update the builders to handle those changes, we'll have to
update the signing and composing systems too.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux