On 07/23/2009 11:48 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:46:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:09:04AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >>> Resending since spot didn't get it the first time. >>> >>> Okay, at the infrastructure meeting this week we had a long discussion >>> about using AGPL in infrastructure and we decided we need more >>> information about what the AGPL requires of us. Here's a run down and >>> then the questions we had. >> >> I invited Bradley Kuhn of the Software Freedom Conservancy to join >> today's IRC meeting. Not sure if he can join, but he's well versed in >> the AGPLv3 and I had pointed him at this thread. He offered to join >> and discuss with us. > > He's at OSCON this week, so I invited him to attend future Thursday > meeting. > Excellent. Depending on when spot hears back from Red Hat legal and whether we have more questions after that, we may just be a case study for him or we may still be in the midst of figuring out what we want to do. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
