On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> The majority of the logs are >> >> 8579992 ./bastion2 >> 12937952 ./cvs2 >> 27913380 ./secondary1 >> 28753276 ./192.168.1.14 >> 31164048 ./192.168.1.25 >> 36747548 ./proxy1 >> 59465200 ./192.168.1.7 >> 78840240 ./proxy2 >> >> >> 12937612 ./cvs2/2009 >> 26187812 ./192.168.1.14/2009 >> 27904380 ./secondary1/2009 >> 30327316 ./proxy1/2009 >> 30495152 ./192.168.1.25/2009 >> 54589944 ./192.168.1.7/2009 >> >> Is it ok to compress older month logs 01/, 02/, 03/, 04, ? >> > > I'd say yes. I believe 01 and 02 are already compressed. I've ack'ed the > nagios alert so we won't get any more until it's either fixed or goes > critical (at 10%) > Ok it looks like 01 and 02 are compressed with bzip2. script to compress for 03 04 ( for i in $(find ./*/2009/03/ -type f); do bzip2 -v $i; done ) &> ~/compress.logs -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list