On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Luke Macken wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 06:35:57AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > Stuff like this comes up from time to time and the question I always have > > is: What is it we're wanting to do that we can't currently do with the > > setup we have now? We're a group with a lot of turnover and almost > > everyone knows how to use apache so why is it worth it to us to switch to > > nginx? > > If we are wanting "to serve static files faster", then yes, Nginx would > do that for us[0]. I use Nginx for all of my personal application > deployments, and I've been extremely impressed with it's speed and ease > of configuration. However, it's WSGI support is a bit questionable, so > we would only want to use it as for serving static files & reverse > proxying. You can also configure it to hit memcached before apache, > which is pretty neat. > That is interesting though, does it just store entire html pages in memcached? -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
