On 07/02/2009 07:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/02/2009 08:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following >> policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing >> >> Do people like it? Is a GPL family license pretty much everywhere good >> for everyone or are there places that we'd like the general rule to be >> "MIT" or something looser instead? > > Has Red Hat Legal been consulted on this? > I've consulted spot. Spot based his input on the policy on feedback he received while relicensing Fedora Community to AGPLv3+. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
