Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing Do people like it? Is a GPL family license pretty much everywhere good for everyone or are there places that we'd like the general rule to be "MIT" or something looser instead? I want to relicense python-fedora (GPLv2 => LGPLv2+), pkgdb and fas (GPLv2 => AGPLv3+) if we approve this. I'll talk to the contributors to those projects to make sure they have no objections first, but is that generally acceptable? Anyone else want to join in on the relicensing? Having things under compatible licenses will make code sharing possible. (GPLv2 only is not compatible with AGPLv3+) which is my incentive for migrating apps that I'm contributing to onto a common licensing scheme. I'm putting this on the meeting agenda for Thursday but discussion in the mailing list is also welcome. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
