On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought >> > I'd ask. Can anyone explain this: >> > >> > http://pastebin.ca/1481219 >> > >> > Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much >> > lower hit rate? >> > >> >> The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can >> have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates >> are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it >> would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is >> a true disparity over caching. >> > > I thought that exact same thing :) > > memcahed1: > STAT uptime 9143 > STAT get_hits 311736 > STAT get_misses 11255 > > memcached2: > STAT uptime 9144 > STAT get_hits 49679 > STAT get_misses 11116 > Now that shows something not kosher. My guess is some app is not talking to both? What apps use memcached for what? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
