On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought > I'd ask. Can anyone explain this: > > http://pastebin.ca/1481219 > > Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much > lower hit rate? > The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is a true disparity over caching. > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
