Re: memcached opinions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought
> I'd ask.  Can anyone explain this:
>
> http://pastebin.ca/1481219
>
> Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much
> lower hit rate?
>

The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can
have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates
are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it
would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is
a true disparity over caching.

>        -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux