On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:54:42AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:03:55PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > We worked pretty closely with different LDAP teams and the way FAS works > > > is just not very... ldapian. Although it's only some internal stuff that > > > we need (specifically related to our user/sponsor/admin bits in each > > > group. > > > > Can't this be implemented with a FAS ldap schema that contains these > > bits in ldap attributes? > > > > Or rephrased: Can't any SQL field in a table be always mapped onto > > some (custom) ldap attribute? If you can map a problem onto an SQL > > database it should be possible to go ldap IMHO. > > > > Seems like it should work that way, and we spent months trying to get it > to work right (even working with the fedora-ds people) but it just ended > up being very hacky and not very good. Maybe if someone gives some detail on why the LDAP setup looked like too hacky we could find a better solution and use LDAP? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpaNAgRdcF5R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
