On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2009-04-29 11:23:55 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > > Can I reverse the question? Instead of a pam_fas module, what about > > creating a way to export FAS information as LDAP, such that all > > LDAP-consuming apps would "just work", albeit not able to access the > > FAS-specific information? > I agree with this approach. In some distant future version of FAS, I'd > like to play with the idea of storing the data in LDAP while handling > our group sponsorship system in postgres. > Ick -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
