On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: > >> >> I'm thinking more like hours. From the last release I monitored: >> >> http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html >> >> We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch. >> I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the >> outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right. >> >> Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of >> mirrors are ready? We currently don't check that prior to announce. >> > > I went by Jesse's wording of "make sure at least a few mirrors are synced" > and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced. > > That's why I sent out the announcement then. > > That may be where the mixup was. It didn't help that I had to stick my big fat nose in and "help" by approving the message in the moderation queue. Sorry I contributed to the angst. :-( -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpFiLiOc7bdl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
