On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 08:54 -0600, Clint Savage wrote: > Yeah, I completely agree. This is of great interest to me because I > can see great opportunities for many types of networks and such. One > application that was brought up that I like, although it's more than > just a caldav/web interface. That application in Zimbra. I > understand it to be exactly what we want with the exception of the > mail component. Maybe there's a way to rip that out (or not set it > up). Also, the licensing may be an issue, but I don't know much about > that off-hand. FWIW, Zimbra is what Red Hat uses internally. It does, indeed, have functional CalDAV support. >From what I've heard it was a bit of a big effort to get implemented, though. It's a fairly big project. It may be subject to the same objections I made to Citadel - it's overkill for a pure calendaring system, and the extra functions aren't necessarily something that add any value if provided by the Fedora project. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
