On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > > * Should the semantic performance impact be significant, is > > > > > hosting a separate Fedora QA mediawiki (with semantic > > > > enabled) a > > > > > possibility? > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is possible, for example we have a smolt wiki seperate from the > > > > normal mediawiki install. The question of performance is, does it > > > > only > > > > impact pages deciding to use semantic or everything? We have lots of > > > > way to test the actual impact of using it. > > > > > > Good question. The feedback I have so far is it affects everything. > > > > > > > I just did some speed tests against the laptop.org instance you linked to. > > At this point I don't think thats a blocker but we may find something out > > later. > > Package review in progress for both extensions ... > > mediawiki-semantic-forms - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490171 > > mediawiki-semantic - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490001 > > I'm playing with the system locally to get more comfortable in this > framework. Is it possible to get a dump of a subset of content from the > fedoraproject.org/wiki so I can get a better sense how things will look > in production? > Yeah we can do that no problem. Can it wait until after the beta launches though? (the 24th) It'll just be easier that way. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
