Re: opengroupware evaluation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Axel Thimm wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03:22AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'd like one of our volunteers to install opengroupware on a publictest
> > server for our evaluation.
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197
> >
> > This is going to take between 5 and 15 hours a week.  Don't volunteer
> > unless you can commit that much time to it.
>
> I've tried to setup ogo a couple of times, and it is cumbersome
> work. I also tried to package it and push it into Fedora, but that's
> non-trivial, from the use of non-FHSable gnustep-make to an own
> foundation library to non-compliant init scripts in sope etc. The
> gnustep-make package for example needs to currently "decide" at build
> time whether to support ogo or the rest of gnustep-* packages in the
> review queue. :(
>
> I dont know about sogo, I hope things have improved (at least the
> binary packages' versions show updates needed for bridging the gap
> between gnustep-* and ogo), and the evaluation will show the status,
> but from what I've looked up recently it looks like bedework is also a
> good candidate for a Fedora calendaring system.
>
> http://www.bedework.org/bedework/
>
> Please consider giving bedework a try as well.

Thanks, that looks pretty slick too.  I'll add it to our list to look at.

	-Mike

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux