On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 13:32 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> We have kind of a de facto no-Java standard in infrastructure. This is >> partially because none of us have had good experiences running apps in >> java and partially because we have noone with Java programming >> experience to fix things if we need to. If you had some people to give >> to us to work on maintaining the server we might be able to work out >> something similar to how zikula is being run for the docs deploy. But >> that doesn't sound like the case :-( > > No, I don't think so. So let's knock Bedework off the list for now, > there do seem to be other viable alternatives. I like Clint's idea of a > wiki page to set the requirements and evaluate alternatives, I will > happily create / contribute to that next week once my brain is working > again :), depending on whether Clint has got around to creating it by > then. Added to my todo. > -- > adamw > Hi all, It's been a day or two since this conversation knocked off, but I think I have a wiki page[1] up with some good information. It is still a bit incomplete and we'll need to spend some time specifically with the features we'd like to see. I've added all of the calendaring servers listed in this thread, if I missed one, feel free to add it on the wiki page. Also, I put together a tentative timeline for when we could have this calendaring server in place. I assume it's based upon desire and time so let's see what we can get done! I'm looking forward to seeing this project a reality. Cheers, Clint 1 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Herlo/Fedora_Calendar_Project_Desired_Features_(Draft) _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
