On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > Hrm, there was no action on my part to touch everything, so I'll have to > do some investigation into what's going on. > > Looking on the server, all the files in > releases/10/Everything/i386/os/Packages/ have varying timestamps, but I > do indeed see some things with a stamp as new as Jan 22. Its certainly > not every file, but I'm still not quite finding any commonality in my > brief looking. More investigation to follow. > I take that back. This happened when I was trying to pre-stage some 11-Alpha content. I misread/misunderstood what --size-only option would do, in relation to --link-dest. I was trying to link 11-Alpha packages to the same ones found in /pub/fedora/linux/releases/development/. However these that were touched were packages that were in development/ that hadn't changed since the F10 release. --size-only seems to have updated the timestamps on these files to match something that was going on with my compose output I was trying to sync in. This was certainly unexpected, and repairing this is going to be... interesting. I need to investigate why my compose hosts are creating a timestamp on these files when they shouldn't be. Sorry for the churn! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
